Computer vision and EMG-based handwriting analysis for classification in parkinson’s disease
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 10362 LNCS, Page: 493-503
2017
- 20Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Handwriting analysis represents an important research area in different fields. From forensic science to graphology, the automatic dynamic and static analyses of handwriting tasks allow researchers to attribute the paternity of a signature to a specific person or to infer medical and psychological patients’ conditions. An emerging research field for exploiting handwriting analysis results is the one related to Neurodegenerative Diseases (NDs). Patients suffering from a ND are characterized by an abnormal handwriting activity since they have difficulties in motor coordination and a decline in cognition. In this paper, we propose an approach for differentiating Parkinson’s disease patients from healthy subjects using a handwriting analysis tool based on a limited number of features extracted by means of both computer vision and Electro‐ MyoGraphy (EMG) signal-processing techniques and processed using an Artificial Neural Network-based classifier. Finally, we report and discuss the results of an experimental test conducted with both healthy and Parkinson’s Disease patients using the proposed approach.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85027687471&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63312-1_43; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-63312-1_43; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-63312-1_43; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63312-1_43; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-63312-1_43
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know