MantisBot Changes Stepping Speed by Entraining CPGs to Positive Velocity Feedback
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 10384 LNCS, Page: 440-452
2017
- 8Citations
- 16Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
This paper demonstrates and analyzes how CPGs can entrain joints of a praying mantis robot (MantisBot) to positive velocity feedback resulting in a duration change of a leg’s stance phase. We use a model of a single leg segment, as well as previously presented design techniques to understand how the gain of positive velocity feedback to the CPGs should be modulated to successfully implement the active reaction (AR) during walking. Our results suggest that the AR simplifies the descending control of walking speed, naturally producing the asymmetrical changes in stance and swing phase duration seen in walking animals. We implement the AR in neural circuits of a dynamic network that control leg joints of MantisBot, and experiments confirm that the robot modulates its walking speed as the simple model predicted. Aggregating the data from hundreds of steps in different walking directions show that the robot changes speed by altering the duration of stance phase while swing phase remains unaffected, as seen in walking animals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85038880436&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63537-8_37; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-63537-8_37; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63537-8_37; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-63537-8_37
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know