Fecal Incontinence
Fundamentals of Anorectal Surgery: Third Edition, Page: 149-160
2018
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Book Chapter Description
Fecal incontinence is a common problem in the population with a devastating effect on quality of life. Initial work-up involves a thorough history and physical exam with a trial of conservative therapy. If conservative measures prove ineffective, the patient should undergo a pelvic floor evaluation including anal manometry, anal endosonography, and defecography to rule out potentially surgically ameliorated fecal incontinence. For patients who have a discrete sphincter defect, an overlapping sphincteroplasty can provide significant improvement in continence. For those patients without a sphincter defect or for those who fail sphincter repair, a trial of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is merited. For those patients for whom SNM is inadequate, there are a variety of sphincter augmentation procedures including Secca® radiofrequency energy application, anal sphincter injectables, muscle transpositions, artificial bowel sphincter, or magnetic anal sphincter. For those who fail all therapies, permanent colostomy can provide relief from intractable fecal incontinence. Figure 9.6 shows a flow-chart showing the evaluation and treatment decision-making for patients with fecal incontinence.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85151626033&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65966-4_9; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-65966-4_9; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-65966-4_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65966-4_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-65966-4_9
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know