Monte-carlo finite-volume methods in uncertainty quantification for hyperbolic conservation laws
SEMA SIMAI Springer Series, ISSN: 2199-305X, Vol: 14, Page: 231-277
2017
- 7Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
We consider hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and review developments in the general area of computational uncertainty quantification (UQ) for these equations. We focus on non-intrusive sampling methods of the Monte-Carlo (MC) and Multi-level Monte-Carlo (MLMC) type. The modeling of uncertainty, within the framework of random fields and random entropy solutions, is discussed. We also describe (ML)MC finite volume methods and present the underlying error bounds and complexity estimates. Based on these bounds, and numerical experiments, we illustrate the gain in efficiency resulting from the use of MLMC methods in this context. Recent progress in the mathematical UQ frameworks of measure-valued and statistical solutions is briefly presented, with comprehensive literature survey.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044370664&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67110-9_7; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-67110-9_7; https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-319-67110-9_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67110-9_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-67110-9_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know