Pitfalls in the diagnosis of occupational contact dermatitis
Kanerva's Occupational Dermatology, Page: 1307-1315
2019
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
• The diagnosis of an occupation-related allergic contact dermatitis can be missed in the various stages of the contact-allergy investigation: the history, the clinical symptoms and localization of the lesions, the skin testing, as well as the determination of the relevance of a positive test. • Airborne contact dermatitis is very frequently caused by occupational exposure. • Basic knowledge on the chemicals contacted is essential, which is not obvious in an occupational context. • It is evident that the more experience the investigator has, the more in an accurate way allergens can be identified. • The knowledge needs to be based on a good training, keeping up with the literature, attending courses and meetings, and the use of relevant websites.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088733523&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_83; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_83; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_83; https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_83
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know