Experience report: Application of falsification methods on the UxAS system
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 10811 LNCS, Page: 452-459
2018
- 11Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In this report, we present our experiences in applying falsification methods over the Unmanned Systems Autonomy Services (UxAS) system. UxAS is a collection of software modules that enables complex mission planning for multiple vehicles. To test the system, we utilized the tool S-TaLiRo to generate mission scenarios for both UxAS and the underlying vehicle simulators, with the goal of finding behaviors which do not meet system specifications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045301105&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77935-5_30; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-77935-5_30; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-77935-5_30; https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-319-77935-5_30; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77935-5_30; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-77935-5_30
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know