Cognitive, developmental, and neurobiological aspects of risk judgments
Psychological Perspectives on Risk and Risk Analysis: Theory, Models, and Applications, Page: 83-108
2018
- 4Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
In this chapter, we explore the literature on the cognitive, developmental, and neurobiological aspects of risk and show how work in this area is important in explaining and understanding decisions relating to risk. We outline different theories of risk preference and risk taking, including prospect theory, traditional dual-process theories, fuzzy-trace theory, and construal level theory. We focus on how cognitive differences can account for differences in risk preference and risk taking and examine how cognitive developmental trends can explain the observation that adolescents (and young adults) are prone to unhealthy risk taking. We outline important work in this area showing that the way information is mentally represented influences decisions relating to risk, in addition to more traditional factors such as reward sensitivity and inhibition. We explain how accounting for the role of mental representation can explain and predict counterintuitive findings in the literature on risk taking. In addition, we consider the neural underpinnings of risk taking and what research into the neural underpinnings of risk taking can tell us about cognitive aspects of risk.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063362381&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_4; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_4; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know