Predictive Biomarkers and Targeted Therapies in Colorectal Cancer
Predictive Biomarkers in Oncology: Applications in Precision Medicine, Page: 423-430
2018
- 4Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) so far has been found to have only a few biomarkers capable of being translated to patient care. These include RAS and BRAF mutation status, microsatellite instability (MSI) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Of these, currently, the only biomarker used to predict response to a targeted therapy is the RAS mutation status. Accordingly tumours with a RAS mutation in exon 2 (codons 12 and 13) of KRAS (about 40% of cases) are not expected to respond to anti-EGFR therapy. In fact, only a small proportion of patients, with KRAS-wt status at exon 2, benefit from the monoclonal antibody therapy. For this reason recent clinical trials have focused on expanding the testing panel to include KRAS and NRAS exons 2, 3 and 4, as well as BRAF, yielding a further 30% of cases non-predictive of response to the antibody therapy. There is, therefore, the need to define potential driver events capable of being utilised as targets for effective predictive drug treatments. To this effect, a list of clinical trials in progress designed to define the novel therapeutic targets is given. A brief consideration is also given to the progress being made towards more accurate prognostic definition of CRC, using an integrated approach to molecular categorisation of colorectal tumours.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134867105&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95228-4_38; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-95228-4_38; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-95228-4_38; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95228-4_38; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-95228-4_38
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know