Scalable machine learning techniques for highly imbalanced credit card fraud detection: A comparative study
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 11013 LNAI, Page: 237-246
2018
- 34Citations
- 64Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In the real world of credit card fraud detection, due to a minority of fraud related transactions, has created a class imbalance problem. With the increase of transactions at massive scale, the imbalanced data is immense and has created a challenging issue on how well Machine Learning (ML) techniques can scale up to efficiently learn to detect fraud from the massive incoming data and to respond faster with high prediction accuracy and reduced misclassification costs. This paper is based on experiments that compared several popular ML techniques and investigated their suitability as a “scalable algorithm” when working with highly imbalanced massive or “Big” datasets. The experiments were conducted on two highly imbalanced datasets using Random Forest, Balanced Bagging Ensemble, and Gaussian Naïve Bayes. We observed that many detection algorithms performed well with medium-sized dataset but struggled to maintain similar predictions when it is massive.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051966431&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97310-4_27; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-97310-4_27; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97310-4_27; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-97310-4_27
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know