Uniform constraint satisfaction problems and database theory
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 0302-9743, Vol: 5250 LNCS, Page: 156-195
2008
- 13Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
It is well-known that there is a close similarity between constraint satisfaction and conjunctive query evaluation. This paper explains this relationship and describes structural query decomposition methods that can equally be used to decompose CSP instances. In particular, we explain how "islands of tractability" can be achieved by decomposing the query on a database, or, equivalently, the scopes of a constraint satisfaction problem. We focus on advanced decomposition methods such as hypertree decompositions, which are hypergraph-based and subsume earlier graph-based decomposition methods. We also discuss generalizations thereof, such as weighted hypertree decompositions, and subedge-based decompositions. Finally, we report on an interesting new type of structural tractability results that, rather than explicitly computing problem decompositions, use algorithms that are guaranteed to find a correct solution in polynomial time if a decomposition exists. © 2008 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=59149105324&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92800-3_7; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-92800-3_7; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-92800-3_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92800-3_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-92800-3_7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-540-92800-3_7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-92800-3_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know