From coordination to stochastic models of QoS
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 0302-9743, Vol: 5521 LNCS, Page: 268-287
2009
- 30Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Reo is a channel-based coordination model whose operational semantics is given by Constraint Automata (CA). Quantitative Constraint Automata extend CA (and hence, Reo) with quantitative models to capture such non-functional aspects of a system's behaviour as delays, costs, resource needs and consumption, that depend on the internal details of the system. However, the performance of a system can crucially depend not only on its internal details, but also on how it is used in an environment, as determined for instance by the frequencies and distributions of the arrivals of I/O requests. In this paper we propose Quantitative Intentional Automata (QIA), an extension of CA that allow incorporating the influence of a system's environment on its performance. Moreover, we show the translation of QIA into Continuous-Time Markov Chains (CTMCs), which allows us to apply existing CTMC tools and techniques for performance analysis of QIA and Reo circuits. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=68749111160&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02053-7_14; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-02053-7_14; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-02053-7_14; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02053-7_14; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-02053-7_14
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know