Testing stream ciphers by finding the longest substring of a given density
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 0302-9743, Vol: 5594 LNCS, Page: 122-133
2009
- 3Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Given a string x[1..n] drawn from the alphabet {0,1}, and a rational density parameter 0 ≤ θ ≤ 1, this paper considers algorithms for finding the longest substring of x with density θ. That is, if the length of the substring is m, the number of one-bits in the substring is exactly θ×m. It is surprisingly difficult to devise an algorithm that has worst case time less than the obvious brute-force algorithm's O(n ). We present three new approaches to reducing the running time, and an algorithm that solves the problem in O(nlogn) expected time. We then apply the new algorithm, as well as an empirical estimate of the lim-sup and the lim-inf of a centred statistic which is expected to obey a law of the iterated logarithm, to the randomness testing of (a) the output of the BSD function Random, and (b) the output of the stream cipher Dragon. The results for these outputs warrant further study. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70350635916&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02620-1_9; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-02620-1_9; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-02620-1_9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-02620-1_9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-02620-1_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02620-1_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-02620-1_9
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know