Incremental list coloring of graphs, parameterized by conservation
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 0302-9743, Vol: 6108 LNCS, Page: 258-270
2010
- 3Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Incrementally k-list coloring a graph means that a graph is given by adding stepwise one vertex after another, and for each intermediate step we ask for a vertex coloring such that each vertex has one of the colors specified by its associated list containing some of in total k colors. We introduce the "conservative version" of this problem by adding a further parameter c ∈ ℕ specifying the maximum number of vertices to be recolored between two subsequent graphs (differing by one vertex). This "conservation parameter" c models the natural quest for a modest evolution of the coloring in the course of the incremental process instead of performing radical changes. We show that the problem is NP-hard for k ≥ 3 and W[1]-hard when parameterized by c. In contrast, the problem becomes fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the combined parameter (k,c). We prove that the problem has an exponential-size kernel with respect to (k,c) and there is no polynomial-size kernel unless NP ⊆ coNP/poly. Finally, we provide empirical findings for the practical relevance of our approach in terms of an effective graph coloring heuristic. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77954433355&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13562-0_24; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-13562-0_24; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-13562-0_24.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13562-0_24; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-13562-0_24; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-13562-0_24; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-13562-0_24
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know