Abstract program slicing: From theory towards an implementation
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 0302-9743, Vol: 6447 LNCS, Page: 452-467
2010
- 15Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In this paper we extend the formal framework proposed by Binkley et al. for representing and comparing forms of program slicing. This framework describes many well-known forms of slicing in a unique formal structure based on (abstract) projections of state trajectories. We use this formal framework for defining a new technique of slicing, called abstract slicing, which aims to slice programs with respect to properties of variables. In this way we are able to extend the original work with three forms of abstract slicing, static, dynamic and conditioned, we show that all existing forms are instantiations of their corresponding abstract forms and we enrich the existing slicing technique hierarchy by inserting these abstract forms of slicing. Furthermore, we provide an algorithmic approach for extracting abstract slices. The algorithm is split into two modules: the simple approach, used for abstract static slicing, and the extended approach, composed of several applications of the simple one, which is used for abstract conditioned slicing. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78649576432&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_30; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_30; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_30; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_30; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_30; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_30; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_30
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know