Eliminating nonmonotonic DL-atoms in description logic programs
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 0302-9743, Vol: 7994 LNCS, Page: 168-182
2013
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Conference Paper Description
Nonmonotonic description logic programs (dl-programs) are a well-known formalism for combining rules and ontologies, where rules interact with an underlying ontology via dl-atoms that allow queries to the ontology under a possible update of its assertional part. It is known that dl-atoms may be nonmonotonic and dl-programs without nonmonotonic dl-atoms have many desirable properties. In this paper, we show that it is possible to remove nonmonotonic dl-atoms from a dl-program while preserving its strong/weak answer set semantics. Though the translation is faithful, it relies on the knowledge about monotonicity of dl-atoms. We then thoroughly investigate the complexity of deciding whether a dl-atom is monotonic under the description logics DL-Lite, scriptEscriptL, scriptSscriptHscriptIscriptF and scriptSscriptHscriptOscriptIscriptN, which is of independent interest for computing strong answer sets. We show that the problem is intractable in general, but tractable for dl-atoms with bounded queries in DL-Lite. © 2013 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84881124111&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_13; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_13; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_13; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_13
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know