Decoding and predicting implicit agreeing/disagreeing intention based on electroencephalography (EEG)
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 0302-9743, Vol: 8227 LNCS, Issue: PART 2, Page: 587-594
2013
- 3Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
A new experiment design is proposed to understand human implicit intention by using electroencephalography (EEG). EEG data is recorded using 32-channel electrodes while seeing various sentences which contain self-relevant contents. Subjects are asked to make a decision of agreement or disagreement just after sentence ending is shown. Based on their answer, support vector machine is used for pattern classification with radial basis function kernel. The classification result shows the intention to the sentences can be classified with 67.89% of maximum average accuracy. The spatial relationship of average classification accuracy shows right frontal areas have relatively high classification accuracy. Our findings indicate that covert representation of agreement or disagreement intention can be found in the EEG band power and it is also possible to predict subjects implicit intention even before making explicit expression. © Springer-Verlag 2013.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84893422324&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-42042-9_73; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-42042-9_73; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-42042-9_73; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-42042-9_73; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-42042-9_73
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know