Bayesian models for structured sparse estimation via set cover prior
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 8725 LNAI, Issue: PART 2, Page: 273-289
2014
- 1Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Conference Paper Description
A number of priors have been recently developed for Bayesian estimation of sparse models. In many applications the variables are simultaneously relevant or irrelevant in groups, and appropriately modeling this correlation is important for improved sample efficiency. Although group sparse priors are also available, most of them are either limited to disjoint groups, or do not infer sparsity at group level, or fail to induce appropriate patterns of support in the posterior. In this paper we tackle this problem by proposing a new framework of prior for overlapped group sparsity. It follows a hierarchical generation from group to variable, allowing group-driven shrinkage and relevance inference. It is also connected with set cover complexity in its maximum a posterior. Analysis on shrinkage profile and conditional dependency unravels favorable statistical behavior compared with existing priors. Experimental results also demonstrate its superior performance in sparse recovery and compressive sensing. © 2014 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84907051367&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44851-9_18; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44851-9_18; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44851-9_18; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44851-9_18
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know