Credibility estimation of stock comments based on publisher and information uncertainty evaluation
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0929, Vol: 481, Page: 400-408
2014
- 3Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Recently, there are rapidly increasing stock-related comments sharing on Internet. However, the qualities of these comments are quite different. This paper presents an automatic approach to identify high quality stock comments by means of estimating the credibility of the comments from two aspects. Firstly, the credibility of information source is evaluated by estimating the historical credibility and industry-related credibility using a linear regression model. Secondly, the credibility of the comment information is estimated through calculating the uncertainty of comment content using an uncertainty glossary based matching method. The final stock comment credibility is obtained by incorporating the above two credibility measures. The experiments on real stock comment dataset show that the proposed approach identifies high quality stock comments and institutions/ individuals effectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84917732172&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45652-1_40; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-45652-1_40; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45652-1_40; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-45652-1_40
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know