Image enhancement methods for a customized videokeratography system designed for animals with small eyes
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, ISSN: 1876-1100, Vol: 269 LNEE, Page: 1001-1009
2014
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
We built a Placido's disc videokeratographic system intended for eye examination of small animals. To derive the corneal topology and other corneal biometric parameters we rely on precise extraction of Placido ring patterns. However, since the images from CCD are noisy, image enhancement is necessary as a pre-processing procedure in order to prevent further noise magnification during the corneal surface topography reconstruction. In this study, two popular image enhancement methods, namely Gabor Filtering (GF) and Multiscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering (MVEF), are quantitatively evaluated in the context of image enhancement before corneal reconstruction. The two methods were tested on 21 images of steel balls with different diameters. Both methods have been demonstrated to be useful for Placido ring extraction; however, the GF method showed better performance on images of steel balls with smaller diameter. Compared to the GF method, the MVEF method performed better on images of steel balls with larger diameter. The result of the present work implies that the two methods should be used cooperatively. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84894450929&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_98; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_98; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_98; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_98
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know