Implementation of Interpolation in Credit Card Fraud Detection
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, ISSN: 2194-5365, Vol: 1118, Page: 125-136
2020
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In today’s world, a critical threat to the Banking and Finance sector as well as its customers is the occurrence of fraud in the credit card transactions. Detecting this fraud is extremely arduous as it forms only a small percentage of the total number of transactions. In this paper, an algorithm which uses artificial neural network to detect fraudulent transactions amongst numerous genuine ones has been proposed. The number of fraudulent transactions is very few in comparison with the genuine transactions which introduces skewness in the data and makes the task of fraud detection difficult. In order to reduce the skewness of the dataset, under-sampling and over-sampling techniques have been used. The algorithm has been tested on three different datasets. The results of all the datasets have been compared. Confusion matrix and ROC plots have been compared. Further to improve the classification, generative adversarial networks (GANs) have been used to interpolate the fraudulent data without duplication on one of the datasets. These results show that there is an improvement in classification by using GANs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082293667&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2475-2_12; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-15-2475-2_12; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-15-2475-2_12; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2475-2_12; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-2475-2_12
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know