Ecosystem Responses to Pollution in the Ganga River: Key Issues to Address River Management
Water Pollution and Management Practices, Page: 221-253
2021
- 3Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
From over five decades, there has been a rapid increase in pollutant concentration in the Ganga River. Much of the debates about the rising pollution in the rivers have been focused on urban sewage input and its associated increase in biological oxygen demand (BOD). Here, we present an overview of explicit multifactor causation, ecosystem-level shifts, multiform determinants (nutrient stoichiometry, transparent exopolymeric particles (TEP), diatom dominance-diversity linkages, microbial extracellular enzymes (EE), ecological response index (ERI), and ecosystem feedbacks), and alternative response indicators to address shifts in ecosystem functions coupling human perturbations. Based on a critical analysis of available studies/data and emerging trends, we argue that anthropogenic influences on the Ganga River are far more severe than what is being predicted from short-term small-scale studies. At many locations, especially those located downstream of point sources, the river is overstepping its resilience as demonstrated by dissolved oxygen deficit at sediment-water interface and associated feedbacks (denitrification, sediment-P and sediment-metal release). Because in human-impacted rivers eutrophication and metal pollution generally occur simultaneously, the EE, ERI, and TEP-diatom linkages provide novel tools to assess how the human activities might impact ecological functioning and assimilation capacity of the Ganga River. These issues set the stage for understanding and assessing current and possible future changes on which the Ganga River management strategies can be keyed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85151221556&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8358-2_10; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-15-8358-2_10; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8358-2_10; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-8358-2_10
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know