How Does State Policy Shape East Asia's Steel Industry? A Selective Review
Growth Mechanisms and Sustainability: Economic Analysis of the Steel Industry in East Asia, Page: 11-42
2021
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
This chapter reviews previous extant research on postwar state policies in East Asia's steel industry. The governments of Japan, the Republic of Korea, and China have always attached great importance to the rapid ascent and restructuring of the steel industry. As a strategic sector, the steel industry requires frequent government interventions to obtain a comparative advantage in raw material sources, technology improvement, and trade. In contrast, the overreaching of the government's involvement has led to market distortions and overcapacity that have worsened with the economic maturity of these three East Asian economies, particularly that of China. The current global steel sustainability is increasingly influenced by excess capacity, low profitability, and environmental issues. As the largest producer, consumer, and exporter in the global steel market, East Asia's steel industry will play a critical role in addressing these problems and in contributing to the low-carbon transition in response to climate change challenges. This chapter outlines the similarities and differences among the state policies in Japan, the Republic of Korea, and China and discusses how they are associated with the steel industry's growth and current issues, which might help identify potential development strategies that can lead to a more sustainable development path.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165117166&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2486-5_2; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-16-2486-5_2; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-16-2486-5_2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2486-5_2; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-2486-5_2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know