A Framework for Translation and Validation of Digital Microfluidic Protocols
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, ISSN: 2367-3389, Vol: 242, Page: 135-149
2021
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Modern bio-chemical protocols are complex in design, and hence there may remain errors which need to be fixed before the protocol is taken up for synthesis. In this paper, we propose a framework for easy specification and efficient verification of a bio-chemical protocol description. We propose a simple and intuitive description template for specifying a bio-chemical reaction that is easy to adopt, and we expect the biologists/chemists to use this to express their protocol descriptions. Once that is done, our framework (a) presents a visualization of the protocol description for easy comprehension, and (b) automatically translates the description to a high-level C program, for analysis. This program, along with a set of properties on the final reaction concentration, is passed on to a verification engine, which checks if the protocol description can indeed generate the desired concentrations on the final outputs. We present experimental results on a few bioassay protocols and show the utility of our framework for verifiable protocol design.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116359941&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4294-4_9; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-16-4294-4_9; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-16-4294-4_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4294-4_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-4294-4_9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know