Endoscopy: Computer-Aided Diagnostic System Based on Deep Learning Which Supports Endoscopists’ Decision-Making on the Treatment of Colorectal Polyps
Multidisciplinary Computational Anatomy: Toward Integration of Artificial Intelligence with MCA-based Medicine, Page: 337-342
2021
- 2Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
The quality and quantity of endoscopic images that physicians obtain are dramatically increasing along with the recent advance in imaging technologies. However, benefits coming from these rich data may not be effectively utilized by all the endoscopists due to the lack of shared knowledge and experience. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) as a decision support during endoscopy is catching great attention as a measure to overcome this issue. In the colonoscopy field, AI is expected to facilitate polyp detection, prediction of polyp pathology, and prediction of invasion depth of colorectal cancer. With the use of AI technologies, the macroscopic anatomy (i.e., endoscopic view) is matched or fused with microscopic findings (i.e., pathological finding) in real time during the endoscopic examination. This new methodology allows clinical doctors to make a decision much easier than the conventional method. These research concepts and results well fit in the anatomy-pathology axis of the multidisciplinary computational anatomy (MCA) model.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141911826&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4325-5_45; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-16-4325-5_45; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4325-5_45; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-4325-5_45
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know