Material Parameter Identification for Brain Tissue Using Open-Source Platforms - GIBBON and FEBio
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, ISSN: 2195-4364, Page: 495-502
2022
- 2Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
An accurate estimation of the constitutive response of brain tissue is a crucial requirement for the development of a neurosurgical simulation framework. In this work, open-source platforms named GIBBON and FEBio have been utilized to solve an inverse finite element-based optimization problem for calibrating the material parameters for the brain tissue. The ex-vivo uniaxial force-displacement data for the goat brain tissue has been used for calibration. The objective of the study is to demonstrate the differences in material parameters calibrated using standard least-square curve fitting and inverse finite element method. Although a close agreement between the stress-strain curves from experimental data, curve fitting and inverse finite element method was observed, however, a significant deviation was found between the material parameters extracted from both the methods. The extracted material parameters could then be used to represent brain tissue for developing and solving boundary value problems concerning neurosurgical procedures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128759163&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9539-1_36; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-16-9539-1_36; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9539-1_36; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-9539-1_36
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know