Additive Manufacturing: A State of Art Review
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, ISSN: 2195-4364, Page: 139-154
2023
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Conference Paper Description
In this study, an attempt is made to investigate the SWOT analysis on Additive Manufacturing by examining the research papers from past one decade (2010–2020). The reviewed paper illustrates how production methods and technology have evolved during the last decade. The organizations are searching better responsiveness for the clients in terms of counting capacity, minimum cost, recyclability or vigorously effective items. In order to address the latest industry problems and consumer requests, organizations are looking for better techniques. Organizations are exploring better techniques to meet the latest market challenges and demands of the clients. In the serious market, client-based manufacturing is the primary concern to improve and broaden strategies and methods in the industries. Today’s market demands simplicity in manufacturing of intricate shapes, time savings, scrap reduction and efficient use of people, machines, money and resources. An industry can only exist today, if it meets every customer’s desire quickly and cheaply. To keep up with the expanding market, industries transitioned from Industry 1.0 to Industry 4.0. According to study findings there are number of recommendations that can be made to practitioners in the business as well as academics, planners and administrators using additive manufacturing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134164166&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1618-2_14; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-19-1618-2_14; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1618-2_14; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-19-1618-2_14
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know