Multi-level Thresholding Partitioning Algorithm for Graph Processing in Cloud Computing
Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, ISSN: 2367-4520, Vol: 126, Page: 819-831
2022
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Book Chapter Description
Graphs are an effective way for data representation, and generally, the graph data size is enormous. Graphs are linked with various revenue-generating applications such as social media, online retail, drug discovery, clinical trials, and businesses. Partitioning is a mechanism used for processing the vast graph data effectively. Graph partitioning efficiently minimizes the energy consumption and computational complexity caused while processing the extensive interlinked data. In this work, node priority and threshold-based graph partitioning algorithms are proposed for achieving energy-efficient graph processing. Most graph partition algorithms promptly minimize energy consumption, but the node priority-based graph partitioning algorithm also delivers enhanced results in the aspect of execution time. In this research work, the power consumption is measured through online power estimation tools. To calculate the energy consumption, in this work, five popularly known graph applications are deployed. The power consumption is categorized into static and dynamic power consumption, estimated using four benchmarked graph datasets. The result analysis includes the energy and performance cost according to the processor. The obtained results show that the proposed runtime is enhanced effectively than the existing works, thus achieving the motto of this research work in the aspect of minimizing the overall energy percentage.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134624299&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2069-1_56; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-19-2069-1_56; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2069-1_56; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-19-2069-1_56
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know