TransCRF—Hybrid Approach for Adverse Event Extraction
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, ISSN: 2367-3389, Vol: 479, Page: 1-10
2023
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures6
- Readers6
Conference Paper Description
In recent times, with the immense availability and usability of Internet, the revealing of adverse drug reaction (ADR) in pharmacovigilance has seen a surge in use of social media and online platform for reporting of ADR. This results in a huge volume of data that is generated in various human languages and need to be processed in order to derive meaningful insight regarding behavior of drugs. The extraction of relevant ADR information from the unstructured has become a very important NLP problem. Because of the tremendous volume of the information produced, it is preposterous to expect to handle the information utilizing conventional strategies. We propose an approach for identification of the ADR phrase using a combination of two different phrase extraction approaches and then collating the output of both the approaches to extract the adverse drug reaction phrases from the natural language text. The proposed method partial F1-score 82.4 for CADEC and 72.8 for SMM4H.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85142770007&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3148-2_1; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-19-3148-2_1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3148-2_1; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-19-3148-2_1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know