Enhancing Safety During Surgical Procedures with Computer Vision, Artificial Intelligence, and Natural Language Processing
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14403 LNCS, Page: 408-421
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Conference Paper Description
Administering the incorrect substances during procedures can lead to undesired outcomes. Anesthetists, especially when fatigued, distracted, or under stressful conditions, are at risk of such oversights. The conventional manual method for identifying, verifying, and preparing such substances has inherent challenges. Addressing these issues is paramount for healthcare professionals and those under their care. This study explores the application of computer vision and artificial intelligence techniques to refine the processes of selection, verification, preparation, and dispensing in procedure settings. The advanced method initiates with scene text detection, extraction, and matching models to discern inscriptions on labels. These inscriptions are subsequently matched with a pre-established database of item attributes using the token set ratio, Levenshtein, and Jaccard distance algorithms. These algorithms provide similarity scores, with the item having the top confidence score being identified as the appropriate one. A groundbreaking facet of this approach is the incorporation of a generalized Ukkonen algorithm, upper bound theory, and branch pruning algorithm. These elements offer an enhanced and more accurate adaptation of the traditional Levenshtein algorithm. Utilizing this method has the potential to drastically diminish errors in procedures and elevate safety measures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85186670161&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0376-0_31; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-0376-0_31; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0376-0_31; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-0376-0_31
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know