gGMED: Towards GPU Accelerated Geometric Modeling Evaluation and Derivative Processes
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14489 LNCS, Page: 378-397
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Geometric modeling algorithms serve as the fundamental computation of CAD/CAM software in the field of computer graphics. The evaluation and derivative processes, being an essential component of geometric modeling algorithms, significantly impact their overall performance. However, when dealing with scenarios involving high-precision models or large-scale datasets, the lack of parallel acceleration for geometric modeling computation results in prolonged computation time and low computation efficiency, hindering the satisfactory experience of user interaction. Although the massive parallelism of GPUs has been proved with successful performance acceleration in various application fields, it has not been effectively utilized for accelerating geometric modeling algorithms. In this paper, we propose gGMED, a GPU-based approach specifically designed for accelerating the evaluation and derivative processes in geometric modeling. To leverage the massive parallel capability of GPU, our approach provides several optimizations such as data reuse, bank conflict avoidance, and pipeline execution, for effectively improving the performance of evaluation and derivative processes. The experiment results on representative GPUs and various NURBS models demonstrate that our approach can achieve up to 10.18× and 34.56× performance speedup in end-to-end process and kernel computation respectively, compared to the state-of-the-art geometric modeling libraries.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85187804082&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0798-0_22; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-0798-0_22; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0798-0_22; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-0798-0_22
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know