Bayesian Optimization for Auto-tuning Convolution Neural Network on GPU
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14492 LNCS, Page: 478-489
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
GPU as a hardware processor plays an important role in the training of deep neural networks. However, when using GPUs for computation on convolutional neural network models, different combinations of GPU kernel configuration parameters have different performance. Therefore, this paper proposes BAGF, a bayesian auto-tuning framework for GPU kernels, which parameterizes the factors affecting the performance of GPU programs and uses bayesian optimization methods to search for the best parameters in the search space consisting of the parameters. Compared with other optimization algorithms, BAGF obtains excellent configuration parameters with fewer iterations. This paper analyzes the performance of BAGF on four benchmarks and compares with other common optimization algorithms. In addition, the performance improvement of each parameter configuration is analyzed. Finally, the BAGF was tested with the convolution layer of Alexnet, and the results of the Roofline model were analyzed. Compared with the original parameter configuration, the speed of BAGF was increased by 50.09%.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85187545344&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0811-6_29; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-0811-6_29; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0811-6_29; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-0811-6_29
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know