Parametric Optimization for Material Removal Rate During Face Milling: Using Experimental and Mathematical Modelling Approach
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, ISSN: 2195-4364, Page: 11-23
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Machining is emerging with a scorching potential to produce the tiniest to most complicated geometrical shapes. This study examines how cutting velocity (CV), depth of cut (DOC), feed per tooth (FPT), coolant flow rate (CFR), nozzle tool distance (NTD), and nozzle elevation angle (NEA) affect MQL face milling of the substrate with titanium nitride-coated carbide inserts. To establish a mathematical model and recognize the significant process factors of these process parameters, several machining experiments based on 3-factor and 3-level factorial experiment designs were completed (L27) with ANOVA tool. The models revealed a correlation between cutting parameters and material removal rate (MRR). The insert geometry, which incorporates a scraping edge, allows for a higher material removal rate even at the critical depth of cut, followed by coolant flow. Optimal process parameters increase MRR by 236%. MVLR second-order empirical model with R2 adjusted of 0.935. Additionally, a mathematical model grounded in empirical data is built to verify material removal rate estimates that would significantly enhance the application of aluminium alloy substrate.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85190258643&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0918-2_2; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-0918-2_2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0918-2_2; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-0918-2_2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know