Combined Effects of External and Nozzle Exit Flows on the Jet Acoustic Power Levels of Chevron Nozzles for Transonic Aircraft
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, ISSN: 2195-4364, Vol: 162, Page: 601-615
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The issue of jet noise pollution from major airports has become increasingly significant. Recent research has indicated that incorporating a geometry-optimized chevron nozzle can effectively reduce jet acoustic power levels. Herein, we conduct a diagnostic investigation into the acoustic power levels of four different chevron nozzles. In silico studies are performed using a validated steady three-dimensional density-based k-ε turbulence model. Our findings reveal that among the four chevron nozzles (sharp, square, flat, and round edge), the implementation of a round-edged chevron proves to be the most effective design choice for mitigating jet noise in transonic aircraft. This design reduces the acoustic power level by 10% when compared to the base model of a classical high-subsonic/transonic nozzle (without chevron), while still maintaining the benefits of momentum thrust. The results of this study contribute to advancements in aero-acoustic research and provide valuable insights for the design optimization of chevron nozzles for transonic aircraft.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85192452288&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1306-6_49; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-1306-6_49; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1306-6_49; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-1306-6_49
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know