Comparing Different Deep-Learning Models for Classifying Masses in Ultrasound Images
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, ISSN: 1876-1119, Vol: 1166 LNEE, Page: 318-328
2024
- 2Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Breast cancer is still the predominant type of cancer that affects women worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI) developers are making great efforts in developing automated computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast cancer prognosis and classification. There are currently no official guidelines recommending the use of AI with ultrasound in clinical practice, and further research is needed to investigate more advanced approaches and demonstrate their utility. In this paper, we use one of the state-of-the-arts segmentation model based on deep learning, as well as compare different recent pre-trained models for the purpose of segmenting and distinguishing between benign and malignant masses in breast ultrasound images. The results showed that among the compared models, the most accurate model was the EfficientNetB7 model which achieved 88% on the segmented input images, that were segmented using the ResUNet model with 0.8932 Dice score and 0.8572 Iou score.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188730119&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1335-6_28; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-1335-6_28; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1335-6_28; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-1335-6_28
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know