Cipher-Prompt: Towards a Safe Diffusion Model via Learning Cryptographic Prompts
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14374 LNAI, Page: 322-332
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Security and privacy concerns associated with large generative models have recently attracted significant attention. In particular, there is a pressing need to address potential negative issues resulting from the generation of inappropriate images, including explicit, violent, or politically sensitive content. In this work, we propose a lightweight approach to learn cryptographic prompts, named Cipher-prompt, to prevent diffusion models from generating undesirable images that are semantically related to protected prompts. Cipher-prompt utilizes an untargeted attack objective to optimize a black-box model and generate perturbations that maximize the semantic distance between the protected class and the generated images. Therefore, Cipher-prompt does not require retraining or fine-tuning of the generative model or images as the training dataset. To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed Cipher-prompt, we conduct thorough qualitative and quantitative experiments, measuring the protection failure rate and collateral impact rate. Experimental results show the efficacy of the proposed Cipher-prompt in balancing risk mitigation with the utility of diffusion-based image generation models.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195139314&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1417-9_30; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-1417-9_30; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1417-9_30; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-1417-9_30
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know