Enhancing Accuracy and Efficiency in Diabetic Retinopathy Detection: A Deep Learning Framework for Fundus Image Analysis
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, ISSN: 2367-3389, Vol: 958 LNNS, Page: 293-302
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
The present research investigates the challenge of accurately and efficiently diagnosing diabetic retinopathy using a deep learning architecture. Our research is based on a sizable dataset of 54,325 fundus images that have been meticulously classified as diabetic retinopathy (DR) positive or negative by medical professionals. The dataset is carefully split into training and validation subsets, with 80% designated for training and 20% for validation, to ensure the robustness of model performance. Convolutional neural networks (CNN), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), recurrent neural networks (RNN), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) are just a few of the machine learning models whose diagnostic performance we examine. CNN came out on top with a precision rate of 98.66% and excellent standards for recall, precision, and F1 score. The results of this study have the potential to significantly improve patient care and treatment by allowing for a quick and precise identification of diabetic retinopathy. The outcomes also demonstrate how medical image processing and diagnosis can be revolutionized by deep learning frameworks.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195599783&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1961-7_19; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-1961-7_19; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1961-7_19; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-1961-7_19
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know