A Safeguard and Safety in E-Health Records: A Committed Clinch
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, ISSN: 2367-3389, Vol: 977 LNNS, Page: 789-799
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Medical gadgets and the improved usability of remote health services have made mobile healthcare and medical services quite popular. The patient's accessible interest in their care and their accessible moral outrage over it combine with these. As a result, a tone of medical data is produced. These datasets need to be transferred, archived, and accessed securely. In this study, we have proposed a practical method for maintaining the identity of clinical data while safeguarding privacy through an effective encryption system. We have also discussed an authorization framework that uses different levels of access. Various entities frequently have access to medical records with differing levels of authorization. We have also discussed a proposed authorization model that uses different levels of access. Various entities frequently have access to medical records with differing levels of proposed model. In this study, we managed patient data access control mechanisms according to the artificial intelligence (AI) scheme. The framework for access control is created using the machine learning (ML) access model. The main justification for this architecture is the ML-based restriction on accessing the data through AI. Additionally, medical data encryption utilizing various authorization approaches has become necessary for proper data access regulation. It could affect user confidence in the e-health paradigm and, as a result, improve usability on a large scale.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85208178984&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2671-4_59; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-2671-4_59; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2671-4_59; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-2671-4_59
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know