Capturing Teachers’ Collaborative Talk Patterns in an Interdisciplinary Lesson Study: A Social Epistemic Network Signature Approach
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14797 LNCS, Page: 333-344
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Recent years, the use of interdisciplinary lesson study has garnered significant recognition, especially in the context of advocating interdisciplinary education. Nevertheless, there is a lack of research on the procedural mechanism of how interdisciplinary lesson study is conducted. As teachers’ collaborative talk gains attention, the framework of Pedagogically Productive Talk (PPT) has been established to facilitate the analysis of this discourse, with dialogue serving as procedural data that facilitates a deeper understanding of collaborative patterns among teachers. Utilizing the Social Epistemic Network Analysis (SENS) approach, this study examined 12 student teachers and 3 faculty members’ collaborative talk patterns with regards of the interactive processes and epistemic patterns in an offline interdisciplinary lesson study. Quantitative analysis revealed active and diverse cross-disciplinary teacher interaction, and cognitive characteristics demonstrate the practical problem identification and resolution in different groups. Besides, although the interdisciplinary lesson study focused on practical problem identification and resolution, there were distinctive interaction characteristics in different stages.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85199536850&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4442-8_26; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-4442-8_26; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4442-8_26; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-4442-8_26
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know