Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Generalized Residual-Based Adaptive Sampling
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14863 LNCS, Page: 320-332
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are the powerful tools in solving partial differential equations (PDEs). In general, the performance of PINNs heavily relies on the sampling distribution of residual points. However, existing sampling methods still suffer from the following problems: 1) poor performance due to ignoring the locations with small PDE residuals; and 2) limited generalizability, i.e., the need to manually tune hyperparameters for every specific PDE. To address these issues, we propose a Generalized Residual-based Adaptive Sampling (G-RAS) method for PINNs. G-RAS incorporates a novel probability density function, which can concern locations with small PDE residuals. In addition, the hyperparameter setting is much less than others, i.e., various PDEs only need to set hyperparameter ranges rather than tuning for each one. Experiments on six widely used benchmarks demonstrate that G-RAS can improve prediction accuracy and convergence speed compared to 10 SOTA methods. The supplementary materials and source code are available at https://github.com/songxt3/G-RAS.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85201070712&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5581-3_26; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-5581-3_26; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5581-3_26; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-5581-3_26
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know