Aggregation Strategy with Gradient Projection for Federated Learning in Diagnosis
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14881 LNBI, Page: 207-218
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Federated learning aims to address privacy and data security concerns associated with distributed data resources. However, data across different clients typically is not independently and identically distributed, resulting in different local optimal objectives. This disparity will hinder the convergence and performance of global models. Moreover, the presence of noisy labels in client data further complicates matters, making it harder to efficiently deploying global models on a single client. To overcome these issues, we propose a novel algorithm called Federated Learning Aggregation Strategy with Gradient Projection Memory (FedGPM), which leverages gradient projection to refine the model aggregation process. FedGPM reduces the impact of data heterogeneity by projecting gradients into orthogonal directions to remove inconsistent gradient components. Based on the gradient projection memory, the server maintains a federated projection matrix for each client, accurately quantifying the distribution difference between that client’s data and the rest. Adaptive update strategy is employed for each layer during local model training, based on the consistency of local and others’ gradient directions, ensuring positive contributions to global model progress. Experimental results conducted on disease diagnosis tasks using the OCT dataset, with varying levels of data heterogeneity and noise label ratios, demonstrate the superior performance of our algorithm over state-of-the-art methods.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200988659&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5689-6_18; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-5689-6_18; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5689-6_18; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-5689-6_18
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know