Additively Manufactured Ceramic Lattice Structures: Fabrication, Challenges, and Applications
Springer Proceedings in Materials, ISSN: 2662-317X, Vol: 52, Page: 129-149
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Book Chapter Description
Ceramic materials are used in the manufacturing of medical devices, aircraft components, and mould casting because of their high melting, excellent compression strength, and high heat resistance. Ceramics are very difficult to manufacture by conventional techniques because of their hardness and brittleness, manufacturing difficulty also makes it costly, and fabrication of ceramic lattice structures (CLSs) is even more difficult, but their extraordinary properties are attracting researchers to do work in this field. CLS reduces the mass of the manufactured item which optimizes the materials and cost for the required functionality. CLS fabrication by additive manufacturing (AM) has too many challenges, i.e. mixing of ceramic oxide powders into photosensitive resin (PSR), as the weight percentage (or the volume percentage) of ceramic powders in the mixture increases, viscosity increases which affects the curing of PSR. To get sufficient strength, sintering of AM fabricated parts is necessary, this also shrinks the volume of the parts. In this paper, the additive manufacturing (AM) processes and the steps by which CLSs are being made have been reviewed and also the previous experimental and simulation research works related to CLS in which static and dynamic mechanical behaviour of different CLSs have been highlighted.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85206611166&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5959-0_9; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-5959-0_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5959-0_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-5959-0_9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know