Improving Text Classification Performance Through Multimodal Representation
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 15037 LNCS, Page: 319-333
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Traditionally, text classification research has predominantly focused on extracting single text features, with limited exploration of integrating other modal information (such as speech and images) to enhance classification performance. To address this research gap, we propose the Multimodal Representation for Text Classification (MRTC) framework. This framework aims to boost text classification performance by incorporating speech, image, and text features. Specifically, we employ advanced text-to-speech models to convert text content into audio features. Simultaneously, we retrieve images closely associated with the text content and extract their visual features to further enrich the information dimension of text representation. Subsequently, we utilize an efficient triplet structure network to fuse the speech, image, and text features, thereby constructing a multimodal feature representation for application in text classification tasks. The proposed MRTC framework achieves high-precision text classification across multiple datasets without requiring additional multimodal annotated data. This characteristic not only reduces the cost of data annotation but also enhances the model’s practical flexibility and scalability. To validate the effectiveness of the MRTC framework, we conduct experiments on six distinct text classification tasks. The experimental results demonstrate the significant effectiveness of our MRTC framework across various text classification tasks.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85209220101&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8511-7_23; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-8511-7_23; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8511-7_23; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-8511-7_23
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know