Red Blood Cell Antigen Typing Based on Image Processing and Machine Learning
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 1844 CCIS, Page: 231-246
2023
- 3Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Red blood cell (RBC) antigen typing is mainly used in blood group testing, which is critical to providing compatible blood and minimizing the risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions in blood transfusion. This study developed a procedure based on image processing and machine learning, to automatically determinate red blood cell antigen type from the RBC agglutination images. Red blood cell agglutination samples were prepared by mixing blood samples with antibodies in a multi-channel microfluidic device and then captured with a high-speed document scanner. Each image contains 24 blood agglutination sub-areas, which would be automatically cut into 24 sub-images and analyzed in the procedure. HOG (Histogram of oriented gradients), Grayscale Histogram and LBP (Local Binary Pattern) features have been extracted from the sub-images and combined with machine learning algorithms for classification. The machine learning algorithms used in this study included k-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). Among them, the average accuracy rate of the combination of SVM and histogram reached 93.41% in determining the blood agglutination patterns (agglutination or no agglutination, binary classification), and the accuracy has reached more than 98% on some data sets. Besides, the study adopted a hierarchical classification strategy using different features and achieved an accuracy of 86.57% in detecting blood agglutination degrees (5 classification).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85172666282&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4402-6_17; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-99-4402-6_17; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4402-6_17; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-4402-6_17
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know