Machine Learning-Driven Reactor Pressure Vessel Embrittlement Prediction Model
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14325 LNAI, Page: 92-97
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The application of machine learning in the nuclear field has been considered for the prediction of neutron irradiation embrittlement of reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels in recent years. In this study, the RPV irradiation surveillance data are summarized and the integration of physical mechanisms with machine learning is investigated. It is found that the experimental results of the fusion model outperform the single machine learning models or physics formulas. In addition, the data amount of the RPV dataset is enhanced using the variational auto-encoder (VAE) model. Then a combined model of VAE and physical formula guided multilayer perceptron (VPMLP) is proposed, and its advantages in terms of prediction accuracy and generalization ability are experimentally demonstrated.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85177166109&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7019-3_9; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-99-7019-3_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7019-3_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-7019-3_9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know