Innovations for Reconfiguring Food Systems
Transformation of Agri-Food Systems, Page: 1-7
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
Reconfiguring food systems to be more resilient, sustainable and equitable presents considerable challenges: food systems are extremely diverse, they are based on biological systems that provide many key functions other than food provision that need to be safeguarded, and large-scale disruption has the potential to be catastrophic. Innovation in several parts of the food system will be necessary, consisting of a mixture of small, incremental shifts to existing systems and practices as well as radical and disruptive changes. Many technological options are already being piloted or in the pipeline that may help to shift food system practices and behaviour in ways that can benefit food security, equity and the environment. Uptake of innovations at scale needs a range of enablers to be in place, such as new policies and regulatory frameworks, innovative funding mechanisms, monitoring and assessment to help avoid unintended consequences, and market incentives to help spread risk. We also need to be innovative in doing agricultural research for development and in monitoring the impacts of change on human and natural systems.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85207203667&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8014-7_1; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-99-8014-7_1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8014-7_1; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-8014-7_1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know