Using Theory of Mind in Explanations for Fostering Transparency in Human-Robot Interaction
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14454 LNAI, Page: 394-405
2024
- 2Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In human-robot interaction, addressing disparities in action perception is vital for fostering effective collaboration. Our study delves into the integration of explanatory mechanisms during robotic actions, focusing on aligning robot perspectives with the human’s knowledge and beliefs. A comprehensive study involving 143 participants showed that providing explanations significantly enhances transparency compared to scenarios where no explanations are offered. However, intriguingly, lower transparency ratings were observed when these explanations considered participants’ existing knowledge. This observation underscores the nuanced interplay between explanation mechanisms and human perception of transparency in the context of human-robot interaction. These preliminary findings contribute to emphasize the crucial role of explanations in enhancing transparency and highlight the need for further investigation to understand the multifaceted dynamics at play.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180629932&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_34; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_34; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_34; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_34
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know