The evaluation map in field theory, sigma-models and strings-II
Communications in Mathematical Physics, ISSN: 0010-3616, Vol: 114, Issue: 3, Page: 381-437
1988
- 20Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper, we examine specifically the rôle of the evaluation map in sigma-models and strings. We discuss the difference between sigma-models and field theory, as far as anomaly cancellation is concerned. The introduction of the Wess-Zumino terms in different sigma-models is considered. Anomalies in string theory are discussed, with special attention to the conformal anomalies and to the sigma-model anomalies for the imbedded (or immersed) world-sheet of the string. Conformal anomalies in two dimensions are connected to holomorphic and gravitational anomalies. In order to have the cancellation of the sigma-model anomalies of the string, certain topological conditions must be satisfied by the ambient manifold. The rôle of the evaluation map in the calculations of global anomalies is also discussed, both for field theories and for sigma-models. In particular global anomalies are connected with the differential characters of Cheeger and Simons. We show that the absence of global anomalies in sigma-models is guaranteed by the absence of torsion in suitable homology groups of the target space. © 1988 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0011055453&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01242137; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01242137; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF01242137; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF01242137.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01242137/fulltext.html; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF01242137; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01242137; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01242137; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF01242137
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know