Evaluation of kernel density estimation methods for daily precipitation resampling
Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, ISSN: 0931-1955, Vol: 11, Issue: 6, Page: 523-547
1997
- 38Citations
- 4Usage
- 52Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations38
- Citation Indexes38
- CrossRef38
- 34
- Usage4
- Abstract Views4
- Captures52
- Readers52
- 52
Article Description
Kernel density estimators ate useful building blocks for empirical statistical modeling of precipitation and other hydroclimatic variables. Data driven estimates of the marginal probability density function of these variables (which may have discrete or continuous arguments) provide a useful basis for Monte Carlo resampling and are also useful for posing and testing hypotheses (e.g. bimodality) as to the frequency distributions of the variable. In this paper, some issues related to the selection and design of univariate kernel density estimators are reviewed. Some strategies for bandwidth and kernel selection are discussed in an applied context and recommendations for parameter selection are offered. This paper complements the nonparametric wet/dry spell resampling methodology presented in Lall et al. (1996). © Springer-Verlag 1997.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0009732879&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02428432; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02428432; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF02428432; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cee_facpub/2505; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3508&context=cee_facpub; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF02428432; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02428432; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02428432
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know