The relationship of the critical stress versus impulse theory of spall fracture to the stress-gradient theory
International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, ISSN: 0020-7268, Vol: 5, Issue: 4, Page: 297-303
1969
- 6Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A spall fracture criterion based on critical stress versus stress gradient is briefly reviewed and discussed. An extension of a technique used by Tuler and Butcher is employed to show that the results of the stress-gradient theory can be interpreted in terms of criteria involving critical stress versus either impulse or pulse duration. The latter criteria are represented by smooth curves that depend on two parameters-the static strength limit for long-duration loads and an impulse limit for short-duration loads. Expressions for these parameters are presented in terms of the two parameters of the stress-gradient theory. Examples are presented for submicrosecond loads on 1100 aluminum and copper that show the stress-impulse interpretation differs little from the pure-impulse interpretation of Tuler and Butcher. © 1969 Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0014636847&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00190959; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00190959; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF00190959; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF00190959; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00190959; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00190959
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know