Problems of interpreting results obtained in studies of somaclonal variation in gliadin proteins in wheat
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, ISSN: 1432-2242, Vol: 73, Issue: 5, Page: 764-766
1987
- 19Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- CrossRef19
- 13
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
It is quite likely that somacloning increases the frequency of mutations: this has, in fact, been claimed for gliadin proteins. However, in such instances it is important to distinguish between true mutations and presumed changes in regenerants due to cross pollination or admixture. We present herein arguments that some so-claimed somaclonal variants in gliadincoding genes are unlikely to be due to mutations since they would have had to involve directed changes at several loci simultaneously. © 1987 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33847488019&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00260788; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24241203; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00260788; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF00260788; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF00260788; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00260788; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00260788
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know